Since last June, when the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional because it contains the words "under God," the nation has hotly debated the precise meaning of this phrase and all of the implications that go along with it.
The two 9th Circuit Court judges who wrote the majority opinion weren't kooky when they made their decision -- their arguments were based on historical circumstances and a careful, conservative interpretation of the Constitution. Their reasoning, however, is ultimately shortsighted and fails to take into account the so-called "ceremonial deism" that pervades American patriotism and culture.
Last Tuesday the 9th Circuit granted a 90-day stay on their original ruling, anticipating a probable Supreme Court hearing on the issue in late April. If Michael Newdow had gotten his way, however, 9.6 million schoolchildren in nine Western states would have stopped reciting the Pledge of Allegiance as of yesterday -
Read More
CLIPPINGER: Take a Women, Gender & Sexuality Course at U.Va.
By Grace Clippinger | 10 hours agoFar from a mere ideology, gender studies provides a critical framework for engaging with a variety of real-world issues.
DUTTENHOFER: Higher education should not reset every four years
By Lucy Duttenhofer | 2 days agoA growing pattern of political interference and upheaval is quietly destabilizing the foundations of both academia and the University itself.
WETMORE: A justification for Gov. Spanberger’s appointments
By Celeste Wetmore | 3 days agoThe Board continued their search without pause in the face of these checks on their operations, demonstrating the detachment of its agenda from community wishes and concerns — and providing clear justification for Spanberger’s actions.
