The Cavalier Daily
Serving the University Community Since 1890

On student self-governance

I PROBABLY should not have to tell anyone that things are usally more complicated than they at first seem, but that is a lesson students should learn during their first year the University of Virginia. To most entering first years, the University's concentrated marketing, corporate "branding" and neat presentation aimed at attracting prospective students create an image of an institution as prim as the University's own line of orange-and-blue neckties.

The fact that the University's marketers neatly package life here isn't surprising, but our issues and institutions aren't as simple as the U-Guides may imply. As a rising third year, it never ceases to amaze me just how many issues there are to be dealt with, how actively they are debated and how much power students have over them.

While the University fills most of its official promotions with gooey rhetoric, the crowing about "student self-governance" is, surprisingly, true. At the University, students not only have Student Council and class councils, but active student-run committees that oversee the honor system and the judiciary. All these groups are elected in a process overseen by a student-run body. A fully independent, completely student-run daily newspaper actively seeks to report on these student groups (and administrators) and to hold them accountable for their decisions.

At very few universities do students have more control over their own affairs, and students here have unique abilities to enact changes meaningful to student life. Students at other universities rarely engage in debate over significant "issues" that they can do something about, but here, such discussion is an important part of the life of our community.

We benefit from highly mature institutions of self-governance, and they deal with issues that are more complicated than at first meets the eye at orientation. Self-governance in this community is not the neat or simple affair that may at first have been marketed to you. The honor system serves as the best example to introduce first-years to the complexity of self-governance.

The average first year's introduction to the honor system likely included, more or less, three facts: that the honor system is old, that the student Honor Committee oversees it and that the only punishment after being found guilty of an honor offense is permanent dismissal from the University -- or the "single sanction." Detail on how the single sanction has become a major and contentious issue in recent years probably wasn't part of your tour.

The University community has engaged in an extended debate on the future of the single sanction, and last semester the results of two referenda leaned toward reforming the sanction system. The Honor Committee itself is exploring alternative sanctions, and debate over the sanction is a common feature in the pages of this newspaper. While proponents of the sanction argue that honor offenses simply cannot be tolerated in a community of trust, other commentators (including this writer) believe that the single sanction is a draconian punishment that is weakening honor by discouraging students and faculty from reporting honor offenses. There are, of course, the accompanying data and the analysis of a large number of participants in the honor system to consider, but ultimately the resolution of this issue spans years and cannot be summarized simply without controversy.

Every student institution has its own issues that our unusually active student body will debate. Honor, the University Judiciary Committee, Student Council, class councils, the University Board of Elections, contracted independent organizations (student groups or clubs) and The Cavalier Daily all are the source of controversies that are significant to your life at the University, from the honor system that guards academic honesty to the bus system that gives you a ride home.

So, I have two pieces of advice. The first is to be aware that the student body here actually does have a great deal of self-governance, but that student issues are much more complex than at first meets the eye. Sadly, many students do not think about these issues much during their time here and first impressions therefore remain, but the health of our community demands that everyone pay attention and re-examine them.

The second piece of advice is -

Local Savings

Comments

Latest Video

Latest Podcast

Ahead of Lighting of the Lawn, Riley McNeill and Chelsea Huffman, co-chairs of the Lighting of the Lawn Committee and fourth-year College students, and Peter Mildrew, the president of the Hullabahoos and third-year Commerce student, discuss the festive tradition which brings the community together year after year. From planning the event to preparing performances, McNeil, Huffman and Mildrew elucidate how the light show has historically helped the community heal in the midst of hardship.