Matt Waring's Nov. 16 Opinion column, "The dishonor of apathy," claimed that because the jury in the open honor trial voted the accused students violated the honor code for act and intent, the jury believed they knowingly violated the honor code. Because the definition of intent includes whether the accused students knew, or should have known, it is impossible to say whether the jury believed they knowingly violated the honor code.
Read More
EDITORIAL: Student self-governance deserves our confidence
By Editorial Board | 3 days agoNow, just a month into the semester, new officeholders appear to be delivering results.
YOUNIS: SJP’s criticism is not hysteria — it is a challenge to U.Va.’s standards
By Ayat Younis | 5 days agoAny leader deserves scrutiny for their professional past, regardless of their background and especially if they have ties to brutal military-industrial complexes through the IDF.
ELJAZZAR: Do not be fooled by the Vanderbilt Report
By Farah Eljazzar | September 14, 2026A report chaired by a philosopher that aims to invoke objective inquiry is hypocritically holding itself to a lower evidentiary standard than it criticizes.
