FOR MOST university students today, single-sex colleges seem like a remnant of their grandparents' time -- an era when men wore coats and ties to class, women were referred to as "ladies" and Detroit actually made quality cars. A small number of single-sex colleges, almost all of them women's, still survive, but their ranks continue to decline. Last week, the Board of Trustees of Randolph-Macon Woman's College voted to open the school to male applicants next year. The decision has sparked a backlash from supporters of single-sex education. While it may be sad to witness the disappearance of an old tradition, the decision to adopt coeducation benefits students of both sexes.
The decisive factor in RMWC's decision to admit men was a simple one: The college needed to increase enrollment if it was to remain financially sound. A Washington Post article reported that the college's steering committee concluded unanimously that no option remained but to go co-ed. This has been the typical scenario for most colleges that were once exclusively female. After men's schools began to admit women in the 1960s, there just weren't enough female students for all the women's colleges. By and large, the few women's colleges that continue to thrive are ones that have managed to carve out a distinct niche, such as the traditional Southern image of RMWC, Hollins or Sweet Briar.
Perhaps that is why the move to coeducation of RMWC, one of the better-known Southern women's colleges, has received so much publicity. The problem faced by RWMC is that, in the words of the University's Dean of Admissions John Blackburn, "There is a very small population of high school girls who apply to women's colleges." The key question raised by this debate, though, is not how women's colleges can continue to stay financially viable. The real question is whether there is a place for women's colleges in modern America.
The typical justifications for modern women's colleges are long on emotion and short on logic. A Sept. 5 article in The Virginian-Pilot interviewed several RMWC students opposed to admitting men. Their opposition to coeducation boiled down to one reason: They felt more comfortable at a university without men. For example, Samantha Henderson said that she was "not afraid to be a leader, not afraid to be bold," and that "you can be comfortable
Read More
EDITORIAL: Carla Williams deserves her seat at the table
By Editorial Board | YesterdayLooking beyond basketball and football reveals that Virginia Athletics is, in many ways, thriving.
UPADHYAYA: The Great and not-so-Good sides of U.Va.’s 2030 housing plan
By Apal Upadhyaya | 4 days agoInstead of improving the dire state of existing infrastructure, however, the University has shifted attention away from it and chosen to expand.
EDITORIAL: Support low-barrier shelters in Charlottesville
By Editorial Board | 5 days agoInvesting in low-barrier shelters now will pay off in increased stability for the homeless, which will undoubtedly improve the safety of shelters and the community writ large.
