In her column (“Pointless preservation,” Oct. 8), Amelia Meyer refers to the restoration of the Lawn and Range rooms as “pointless preservation.” Public and private institutions in possession of historic structures must make difficult choices about how to balance the demands of preservation with other objectives.
Meyer admits that “maintaining the integrity of the buildings” is “an acceptable undertaking worth the cost,” but it follows that the use of authentic building materials and methods is a part of such maintenance. The preservation of the Academical Village — a World Heritage Site — demands sensitivity to the craftsmanship of these buildings. The replacement of decayed or inappropriate window sashes (window framing, not curtains) is certainly expensive, but such costly repairs for landmark buildings are necessary rather than pointless.
It is disappointing that Meyer suggests that the preservation of the Lawn and Range rooms evokes feelings of a time when “segregation and gender discrimination were openly endorsed.” Such a charge could be leveled at nearly all old buildings.
Philip Herrington
GSAS III
Read More
LETTER: Your U.Va. Health System coverage lacks important context
September 9, 2024I understand this event could be seen as “breaking news,” but your reporting left out relevant, easy-to-find, publicly available data to give it proper context.
LETTER: U.Va.'s relationship with the University Guides
By Stephen Farmer | August 30, 2024We are grateful to the leaders of the Guide Service for being open to working with us to improve the reliability and consistency of their tours.
LETTER: It is critical to hold individual hazers accountable
By Todd Shelton | May 10, 2024But while education is absolutely integral to hazing prevention, we must also hold individuals accountable for their hazing behavior.
