The ban on signs at athletic events remains in place following the first meeting involving Student Council, HooCrew and the athletic department since the ban was created.
The athletic department refused comment on the planned duration of the ban, but released a statement from University Athletics Director Craig Littlepage, about the meeting.
“I felt we had a good discussion that provided the opportunity to develop mutual goals, including support for our teams and good sportsmanship,” the statement reads. “There would be value to having a small group of student leaders and student-athletes hearing my concerns, and making recommendations about enhancing sportsmanship and the game experience.”
The athletic department first instituted the ban to promote a “positive game-day environment.” Student Council President Matt Schrimper said that during the meeting, Littlepage reiterated the department’s concerns about a downward spiral of sportsmanship not only at the University, but nationwide.
Schrimper voiced his concern that the institution and continuance of the ban infringed on students’ right to freedom of expression and failed to recognize the principle of student self-governance, a central component of the University community.
“It seemed counter to the way we traditionally do things at the University,” he said.
He added that Council did not consider the environment at athletic events to be negative, describing the decision as “unnecessary” and “superfluous.”
HooCrew President Kevin Dowlen, who also attended the meeting, agreed with Schrimper, stating that students’ signs often encourage athletes and are beneficial for the University’s athletic teams.
“On some degree, it seemed to display a disconnect between the athletic department and students at the University,” Schrimper said. “It took a problem that the athletic department perceived and applied a negative solution instead of promoting positive sportsmanship.”
As a compromise, Council suggested that a sportsmanship campaign be implemented at the University in return for repealing the ban. In the meantime, however, Council is organizing a “Sea of Blue” protest at this week’s football game against Maryland, Schrimper said.
Despite the lobbying and controversy, some students remain indifferent. Third-year College student Katrin Schulz said the hype around the ban was overblown.
“I don’t think it’s a violation of freedom of expression,” she said. “There are other ways to show school spirit. Put it on a T-shirt. Write it on your face.”
Although the ban remains in effect, Littlepage’s statement notes that he believes students and the athletic department “are in agreement to explore the possibility of a sportsmanship initiative using student input.”
Read More
University community reflects on two-year anniversary of Nov. 13, 2022 shooting
By Jackie Bond | 18 hours agoMembers of the University community came to South Lawn at 7 p.m. to pay their respects to those lost two years prior by placing a candle on the steps of Old Cabell Hall.
Student Council supports religious accommodations, calls for Nov. 13 memorial holiday
By Lucia Gambacini | 18 hours agoSecond-year College Rep. Ian Travis proposed legislation requesting standardized academic accommodations for students observing Yom Kippur.
Severe flooding cancels classes, trips for U.Va. in Valencia study abroad program
By Bertie Azqueta | YesterdayAdministrators canceled classes for students studying abroad in Valencia beginning Oct. 29 due to transportation concerns. Classes resumed Monday.
