In its first meeting of the semester, the Honor Committee discussed a proposed constitutional amendment that would increase transparency between the Committee and the University community.
The amendment, proposed by Graduate Rep. Alexander Cohen, argues that students have "a right to know" certain information about decisions made by the Committee.
Cohen said he drafted the amendment to promote "discussion on what's going on in cases."
To accomplish this, Cohen proposed that certain information be disclosed to students after hearings and reports. This information would include documents considered during the Investigative-Panel hearing, which determines whether the case will go to trial or be dropped. Other possible information that falls within a student's "right to know" includes the names and titles of the individuals who vote on the decision made at the I-Panel hearing.
Committee Chair David Truetzel said while the amendment could create openness, there are concerns about "protecting people's identities" involved in cases, "legal liabilities" and other possible negative effects.
Cohen said he plans on writing two new proposals for next week, one of which will detail what information would be disclosed to students involved within a case and another outlining information that would be disclosed to the public.
In addition to Cohen's "right to know" amendment, Truetzel proposed an amendment to change the language in Article VII in the Committee's constitution, which affects amendments themselves and when they must be submitted to the University Board of Elections to be put on a ballot as referenda. Under the current language of Article VII, the referendum election must be held "two to six weeks ... after receipt of the proposal," which Trutzel called "incredibly confusing." His amendment would remove that language from the Committee's constitution and would instead hand the responsibility of establishing deadlines to UBE.
Truetzel said he has been working with members of the University Judiciary Committee and Student Council on similar amendments to ensure the amendments and decisions are "uniform across the board."
Lastly, Vice Chair for Trials Alex Carroll presented an amendment that would set a default jury composition and trial choice to settle instances in which students tried in the same trial cannot reach an agreement on their desired jury composition and trial choices.
According to the proposal, in those cases, their jury panel "shall consist of both elected school officers and student jurors," and their trial shall be private instead of open.
"I like the default ideas," said Truetzel, so that the committee can ensure they are "consistent" every time in handling these disagreements.
Currently, all three proposals are being considered as constitutional amendments, and require a two-thirds vote by the Committee to be placed on the UBE ballot. Each proposal will be discussed further and possibly voted upon during the Committee's next meeting, Truetzel said.
Read More
Severe flooding cancels classes, trips for U.Va. in Valencia study abroad program
By Bertie Azqueta | 1 hours agoAdministrators canceled classes for students studying abroad in Valencia beginning Oct. 29 due to transportation concerns. Classes resumed Monday.
Remembering a tragedy: A look at the aftermath of Nov. 13 over the past year
By Grace Thrush | 23 hours agoOver the past year, several developments in the aftermath of the shooting, from an independent review of the University’s response to a settlement for the victims’ families, have transpired.
Out-of-state students endured a series of obstacles in obtaining absentee ballots
By Bennett Galper and Jackie Bond | YesterdayFour states — Missouri, Mississippi, Oklahoma and South Dakota — require notarization to either receive an absentee ballot or have it be officially counted.
