Edward Rothstein's Jan. 27 review in The New York Times of the new National Museum of American History's exhibit, "Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: Paradox of Liberty," notes that American Indians, indentured servants and women need a separate historical examination than that offered by the Smithsonian exhibit, which is also opening at Monticello.
How I wish Mr. Jefferson's University of Virginia would heed Rothstein's advice. At the University, the study of American Indians does not receive, as Rothstein advises, "different qualifications and examinations"; far from it. There are no formal academic programs or degrees at the University devoted to American Indians. There are also no tenured faculty members who are American Indian.
Read More
GARVIE: U.Va. should focus on understanding AI before implementing it
By Adeline Garvie | YesterdayBecause there is no singular or correct approach in an educational world of individualized, class-specific policies, the University must mandate AI literacy training on the ethical, environmental and practical concerns for generative AI.
CLIPPINGER: In praise of the ENWR during the age of AI
By Grace Clippinger | 4 days agoWriting allows us to clarify complex ideas, wrestle with ambiguity and engage critically with texts and concepts.
HAWKINS: Virginia Democrats, do not blow this up
By Joshua Hawkins | 5 days agoWith the turmoil at the federal level dominating much of the 2025 campaign, voters did not cast their ballot with an appetite for statewide left-wing activism — they cast their ballot hoping for some semblance of normalcy.
