The Cavalier Daily
Serving the University Community Since 1890

I would be honored

My biannual correspondence with the Honor Committee

Sometime during the first seven days of my first year last fall, when I was still trying to figure out the location of Gibson Hall and attempting to incorporate dining hall food into my regular diet, I received a grounding message in my snazzy new U.Va. Gmail inbox from the Honor Committee.

Bearing the subject line “Honor Committee Juror Call,” it began with a panegyric of all the wonderful civic good done by honor juries, followed by the less decorous point that I had been randomly selected to “volunteer” as a juror, slyly noting that failure to show up meant I would be attacked full-throttle by the University Judiciary Committee. I immediately wondered if there was some clause exempting those who had not yet seen the inside of a classroom, much less completed a single assignment. But finding nothing, I pulled up a map and reluctantly showed up at the meeting.

For me, the honor system means refraining from committing a few obviously immoral acts in exchange for some notion of it being safe to leave my backpack at a desk unattended. If a person bases whether or not to cheat on the threat of punishment, he or she is probably in need of some serious moral self-reflection. Not enamored with the concept of random first years giving such life-changing verdicts, I would have felt more accomplished leaving my relationship with Honor in a state of statutory neglect. Nonetheless, uncomfortable with the idea of lying to get out of it, I signed up for an uneventful weekend and did my duty.

After a stressful 10-hour shift, I was pleased to hear that my name would be taken out of the lottery — a euphoria which lasted all the way until the beginning of the spring semester when I got another friendly email bearing a familiar subject line. Risking whatever punishment comes from questioning an Honor Committee decree, I sent a polite and timid response letting them know of my former retirement from jury service. Saved.

Cue modern day. I have recently received my third mandatory invitation to jury service, and being an older and wiser second year — let’s not forget how just last semester the Class of 2016 dumped enough alcohol in a moment of panic to ensure that nothing green will ever again grow in the greater Charlottesville area — I took this as a compliment.

While my initial annoyance and angry refusal might have suggested otherwise, it is hard not to take pride in being on the Honor Committee’s shortlist. I can only assume this is due to my profound legal acumen as both my parents are non-trial lawyers and I have seen “My Cousin Vinny” a number of times.

It might be easy to try to reason this away as a mistake, but I see a different narrative. Last year saw the defeat of the proposal to replace random student juries with a council made up of informed Honor Committee members. But perhaps after my stunning 10-hour performance as an arbiter of justice, they’re attempting to create a team of super jurors, à la Marvel’s Avengers.

I, for one, applaud the initiative, with the obvious caveat that I do not want to be involved in any way — though I am certainly tempted. After all, who would refuse this ultimate authority over an entire student body?

Just kidding — the freedom to sleep through my weekends is just too much to give up.

Christian’s column runs biweekly Fridays. He can be reached at c.hecht@cavalierdaily.com.

Local Savings

Comments

Latest Video

Latest Podcast

With Election Day looming overhead, students are faced with questions about how and why this election, and their vote, matters. Ella Nelsen and Blake Boudreaux, presidents of University Democrats and College Republicans, respectively, and fourth-year College students, delve into the changes that student advocacy and political involvement are facing this election season.