The Honor Committee released a Statistical Transparency Reporting Portal in March with data on Honor reports and cases over the past eight semesters, from spring 2017 to fall 2020. The website allows the public to interactively view the process for cases reported to the committee and demographic statistics that, until now, were only viewable by Honor members.
Between spring 2017 and fall 2020, 286 reports to Honor for cheating, stealing and lying resulted in hearings. There were 87 total cases in 2020, and the majority of accusations were for cheating.
The data is displayed as rolling proportions and includes a rolling average of the number of students involved in each step of the case process — calculated over eight semesters — based on students’ school, race, international status, student-athlete status, gender and year.
Data expressed includes the number of students who were reported to Honor, filed informed retractions, had their cases dropped by an investigative panel, were formally accused of a violation and had hearings and were found guilty of a violation. Informed retractions occur when students admit guilt after being informed of an Honor offense report and take a two-semester leave of absence from the University.
Second-year College student John Sun chairs the statistical transparency working group, whose members worked for about a year to create the website. The group worked with Information Technology Services to design the data portal’s layout.
Sun said one of the main difficulties in designing the website was creating a horizontally oriented scrolling layout, as he wanted the website to flow horizontally like the Honor case process flow chart.
“A completely horizontally scrolling website ... is basically the opposite of what the ITS web design teams have in their template databases, so a lot of the basic structure had to be designed and created from the ground up,” Sun said in an email with The Cavalier Daily.
Additionally, he noted that conveying the data in a way that maintains transparency and protects confidentiality of students and reporters can make the website challenging to interpret. Instead of explicitly listing the specific demographic information of accused students each semester, rolling proportions and averages are computed over eight semesters.
"We purposefully hinder the interpretability of the data so that we can best present general trends while at the same time obfuscating individual cases in order to minimize the probability that individuals can be identified,” Sun said.
The majority of reported cases are cheating offenses, with a rolling average of 25.875 cheating offenses, 6.125 lying offenses and 2.375 stealing offenses per semester over the past eight semesters.
Ryan Keane, former Honor committee chair and fourth-year College student, said he hopes the data transparency website will aim to make Honor “more prominent and more in touch” with the University community.
Additionally, he said that the website will increase the committee’s transparency which follows the release of the Bicentennial Report in 2019. The report was the largest internal review of Honor and featured data from a century of annual dismissals, three decades of data on all sanctions and six years of full data from reports and outcomes.
“Honor gets a lot of criticism for a lot of reasons and a lot of that criticism is valid, but I think this shows that we aren’t just saying things,” Keane said. “We learned from what was in the bicentennial report and we took action based on it.”
International students
The Bicentennial Report showed an over-representation of Honor violation accusations against international students and Asian Americans. 28 percent of students found guilty between 2012 and 2017 were international students despite only making up 10 percent of the student population while Asian American students comprised 27.2 percent of all reports and made up about 12 percent of the student population in the same period.
Keane said that the over-representation in reports against Asian Americans and international students expressed in the report can help University members to recognize possible implicit biases against these groups.
According to the data transparency website, a rolling average of 2.25 international students, or 7.38 percent of reports, and 21.25 domestic students, or 69.67 percent of reports, were reported to Honor each semester over the past four years. A rolling average of seven students per semester did not have their international status listed.
Overall, data presented on the website makes it inconclusive to determine whether international students have been disproportionately reported over the past four years. This is due to the fact that while just 2.5 percent of reported students between 2012 and 2017 had unknown international statuses listed in the Bicentennial Report, 22.96 percent of reported students between spring 2017 and fall 2020 had no international status listed on the data transparency website.
Out of reported international students over the past four years, none have been found guilty and a rolling average of 0.25 domestic students have been considered guilty — and subsequently faced the single sanction of expulsion — each semester.
Asian American, Hispanic and African American students
Between spring 2017 and fall 2020, an average of 19.07 percent of reported students were Asian American each semester while approximately 13.2 percent of the student body was Asian American. In the same period, an average of 4.67 percent of reported students each semester were African American, 3.5 percent were Hispanic, 3.1 percent were unspecified and 45.5 percent of reported students’ races were unknown.
Out of reported Asian American and white students over the past eight semesters, an average of 0.078 percent — an average of .25 students per semester — were found guilty in both demographic groups. No African American, Hispanic or Hawaiian Pacific students were sanctioned during this period.
Overall reports and sanctions
According to the website’s most recent data, the committee saw 74 cheating cases, two stealing cases and 11 lying cases in 2020, of which none of these cases resulted in a guilty verdict. Of the accused students, 28 filed informed retractions. Students who do not take IRs go through a trial and face expulsion if found guilty.
Between 2017 and 2020, only five students were found guilty at hearings of committing Honor violations out of 282 total reports during the period. Four students were sanctioned for cheating in 2019 and one student was sanctioned for the same offense during the year prior.
Only one student over the past four years “left admitting guilt,” meaning that they were dismissed from the University after failing to request a hearing within seven days of being notified of their accusal.
In 2019, Honor had 78 total hearings compared to 87 hearings in 2020. Keane said this increase can't necessarily be attributed to online learning during the pandemic, though some professors saw cheating as a greater concern with virtual examinations.
“Anecdotally people think — and I would agree, just based on what I’ve heard — that cheating was a lot higher because of COVID, because of it being online, but it's hard to make a definitive conclusion based on just that data alone,” Keane said.
Read More
UJC sees “major influx” of cases with 38 adjudicated so far this term
By Ford McCracken | 10 hours agoAlongside an increase in cases, the Committee saw increased interest during recruitment
Shots fired reported on 800 block of Hardy Drive
By Thomas Baxter | YesterdayLongo said to avoid the area for the time being.
Honor Committee discusses panelist questioning policy in new sanctioning framework
By Lexie Stadler | YesterdayThe Committee discussed two potential approaches for determining the relevance of panelist questions.
