The Cavalier Daily
Serving the University Community Since 1890

You cannot say money is the problem for Virginia football

With a recent influx of cash from anonymous donors, Virginia football is out of excuses

Virginia's offense huddles, surrounded by legions of Clemson fans.
Virginia's offense huddles, surrounded by legions of Clemson fans.

Editor’s Note: The author of this article is a student intern for Cav Futures. His views do not necessarily represent those of the organization.

The opaque nature of NIL has resulted in a Cold War-ish state of college football, ripe with bluffs and rumors. Of course, certain NIL measuring sticks such as Ohio State’s “$20 million dollar roster” and Phil Knight’s blank check to Oregon have reached almost mythological standing. But while the financial firepower of many schools remains ambiguous, one thing is clear — money helps. 

So when Virginia football received an anonymous, multi-million dollar donation, there was reason to feel optimistic about a program coming off three straight losing seasons. Although the exact figure remains unknown, certain details have been declassified. Lo Davis, executive director of Cav Futures, the official NIL collective of Virginia Athletics, confirmed the gift is the largest non-capital gift in the program’s history. It is also the first donation made to Virginia Athletics by this particular anonymous donor, whoever they are. 

Just over two weeks after the donation, another anonymous figure promised to match every donation made to Virginia football from Dec. 19, 2024, until Aug. 30, 2025, up to $3 million total. Interestingly, this donation’s focus is to enhance player nutrition while also aiding in travel and recruiting. That caveat narrows the list of suspects for this anonymous donor to well-off foodies who love Virginia Athletics. 

Rather than who made the donation, the real question becomes how much it will help the Cavaliers. Money, after all, is just one aspect of a winning program. While record-setting, the largesse does not on its own thrust the program into the upper crust of college football. There is still recruiting to do, and impediments to clear, and a culture to improve — all things weighing this program down even as the money begins to flow.

As the NIL market explodes across all sports, projected to exceed $2.5 billion in 2025, player contracts balloon along with it. Virginia’s financial windfall has to be considered in this context — the nation’s top 25 quarterbacks are projected to command over $1 million per season in 2025. 

But reaching the top 25 is an unrealistic goal, at least for now. More incremental progress, like reaching a bowl game or avoiding humiliation by Virginia Tech, feels more appropriate. 

Davis expressed in an interview on the Hoos On Podcast that the donation “absolutely” puts Virginia football in the top half of the ACC in financial efforts. Davis’ estimation might even be an understatement, as 247 Sports ranked Virginia 13th nationally in NIL efforts among public universities back in August, second among ACC schools behind Florida State. 

The timeline for a turnaround remains unclear, but at the very least, the influx of money is a step toward identifying, through process of elimination, what is inhibiting this program. The money is there — are the other pieces as well?

Another hulking roadblock to improvement is one many Virginia fans might not consider — admissions. Recruiting will always be the primary means of roster construction, but the transfer portal has become a close second. Every team in the College Football Playoff, with the exception of Clemson, started at least one undergraduate transfer. The best teams in the sport all have embraced the portal. Virginia cannot. 

Virginia’s Office of Admissions insists on requiring undergraduate transfers to complete 60 credits of coursework at the University. This is a stricter requirement than what is enforced at equally prestigious institutions. 

It is simply not possible for undergraduate transfers with one remaining season of eligibility to knock out 60 credit hours in one year. Even for athletes with a more workable timeframe, the academic rigor associated with a heavy course load must be a deterrent. And how can you blame them? Being a Division I college football player is practically a full-time job and requires a substantial devotion of time.

Academic altruists can turn their noses up all they want, but you cannot blame an athlete for prioritizing their performance and going somewhere that allows them to maximize their value in a finite window. At the end of the day, that is just good business. Other schools have loosened their restrictions, but Virginia admissions refuses to bend its holier-than-thou attitude, at the cost of the program.

Apart from the transfer roadblocks, more general recruiting class issues exist. Virginia’s 2025 recruiting class ranks 56th in the country, according to 247 Sports. That is the best mark in the Tony Elliott era, but it is still behind where the program used to finish, like when it finished in the top 45 for three straight years, from 2019 to 2021. 

Virginia’s recruiting is stuck in a positive feedback loop — the team is not good, so fans do not come to the games, so recruits do not come to the school, at least partially because the attendance is bad. Virginia was 5-5 going up against Southern Methodist with a bowl game hanging in the balance and recruits in attendance. Roughly 36,000 fans showed up in a stadium that seats over 60,000. The following week, Virginia played 5-6 Virginia Tech in Blacksburg — with the same stakes for the Hokies, many of the same recruits in attendance — but 65,000 fans packed Lane Stadium to capacity. 

Something has to give for Virginia football to right the ship. Fans have made it clear they are not going to show up until the on-field product improves. With the new $80 million facility and now multi-million dollar donations, the financial investment is there. Now all that is left to do is put these tools to work to shift the culture. 

CORRECTION: A previous version of this article cited information from jerryratcliffe.com. This information was speculative and was misconstrued as fact. The information in question has been removed from the article.

Local Savings

Comments

Latest Video

Latest Podcast

Editor's Note: This episode was recorded on Feb. 17, so some celebratory events mentioned in the podcast have already passed.

Hashim O. Davis, the assistant dean of the OAAA and director of the Luther Porter Jackson Black Cultural Center, discusses the relevance and importance of  “Celebrating Resilience,” OAAA’s theme for this year’s Black History Month celebration.