I understand this event could be seen as “breaking news,” but your reporting left out relevant, easy-to-find, publicly available data to give it proper context.
We are grateful to the leaders of the Guide Service for being open to working with us to improve the reliability and consistency of their tours.
But while education is absolutely integral to hazing prevention, we must also hold individuals accountable for their hazing behavior.
We recognize that the Honor process can be stressful and that any student may benefit from support, regardless of an underlying health condition.
We should not address this war with blind idealism. We should address it, instead, with nuance and care.
The P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society Recognizes Individuals Who Enrich The University Community Through Their Silent And Selfless Service.
The 134th Cavalier Daily Editorial Board affirms the importance of supporting transgender and LGBTQ+ students, faculty and staff on Grounds, always and especially in the face of bigotry and anti-transgender rhetoric.
I encourage everyone to decide for themselves which perspectives are worthy of admiration and allow others to do the same
Considering these factors in an essay rather than a checkbox is a laudable step that will further enable the admissions committee to see students’ individuality.
This New Academic Year The P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society Chose To Recognize Eight Fourth Year Students Who Went Above And Beyond For Their Communities And Lead Lives Of Silent And Selfless Service.
Now as a member of the University Board of Elections, I regret not voting in those earlier elections — I have since realized how much influence student self-governance has on Grounds.
The 43 Society will always be here supporting you, whether you see us or not.
We don’t have to be trans to understand the alienation that comes from being prohibited from being who you are.
Ellis was into "cancel culture” when it was a tool of the right-wing to suppress topics such as gay rights that they saw as a threat.
I know Mr. Ellis and can assure the misguided students who composed this scurrilous missive that he is the polar opposite of their characterization.
As students and faculty leave the University Grounds for the summer, it’s valuable to remember other institutional leaders whom they can influence whether they’re on campus or not.
What’s more outrageous — that students stand up for vulnerable members of the University community, or that faculty attack them in print for doing so?
Those of us who support free speech do so, in part, because, in a democratic society, none of us can see the whole truth and all of us benefit from being exposed to perspectives that may comprehend some aspect of the truth better than we do.
"To offer only a digital contextualization is to assert the primacy of technology and play into this detachment and commodification of the land."
A third-year College student responds to an Opinion Columnist's argument that college leftists are "gaining an authoritarian streak" in regards to their interpretation of the First Amendment.
