Opinion

Opinion

Come on, Cuccinelli

By Managing Board | April 3, 2013

Cuccinelli has been a thorn in the University’s side as attorney general; as governor, he could do a lot more damage. His action against the sodomy ruling suggests, first, a grave misunderstanding of the proper scope of government in relation to individual freedom — why should the state tell consenting adults what they may or may not do in the bedroom? — and second, a sinister impulse toward homophobia, as sodomy statutes have historically been strategically enforced to persecute gay men.

---

Opinion

We don’t have much time

By Forrest Brown | April 3, 2013

To curb the effects of partisanship on our representatives, term limits — similar to the two-term limit imposed on the presidency — need to be instituted for all positions in Congress.

---

Opinion

Pull the plug on plug-pulling

By Andrew Kouri | April 3, 2013

Every time I fly, I am reminded of society’s willingness to comply with the status quo when I am forced to pause my music until reaching the magical altitude of 10,000 feet, below which my Kindle would supposedly send aircraft, satellites and the International Space Station spiraling into Armageddon-style oblivion.

---

Opinion

More than the bare minimum

By Claire Wyatt | April 3, 2013

In the last decade, MIT, Georgetown, UC-Berkeley, all eight Ivy League schools and many other institutions have committed to paying their employees a living wage. At U.Va., paying employees a living wage would require a reallocation of a fraction of one percent of the annual operating budget. Why has U.Va. refused to join its peers?

---

Opinion

Making the best MOOCs

By Lou Bloomfield | April 3, 2013

The University may be proud of the “How Things Work” Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) I’m teaching, but my workload in producing that MOOC is my own doing.

---

Opinion

The pursuit of happiness

By Virginia Moore | April 2, 2013

For these little things — these little joys — the bottom why comes down to someone giving back.

---

Opinion

The Facebook delusion

By Fariha Kabir | April 2, 2013

Scrolling Facebook, looking at the many marriage-equality images, I question how many people posted the picture because they were aware of the Supreme Court cases and how many posted it because of peer influence.

---

Opinion

Searching for reasons

By Alex Yahanda | April 2, 2013

Even if you do not use Google, you are probably aware of the search engine’s practice of stylizing its homepage logo into quirky doodles. The doodles normally reference a particular person or event, usually one that coincides with the date on which the doodle appears. Many users consider the doodles one of the site’s endearing characteristics. This past Easter, though, Google’s doodle incited controversy in a ridiculous instance of religious outrage.

---

Opinion

The need to succeed

By George Knaysi | April 1, 2013

Groves makes a point that should be self-evident but is not. For students looking to distinguish themselves and make a lasting contribution to the University, a better approach may be to work with the raw materials of a lesser-known CIO than to occupy a well-established leadership role, however coveted.

---

Opinion

The laugh of the beholder

By Walter Keady | April 1, 2013

Vulgarity in humor is nothing new. One might even call it cliché. Whether in Shakespearean plays, on Vaudeville stages or on Comedy Central, offensive humor is everywhere. While it is nearly impossible to define exactly what makes people laugh, blatant and/or intentional offensiveness is often so different from normal behavior that it comes off as funny. Creating laughter seems harmless enough, but disrespectful jokes, though intended to be humorous, are often vilified when their content involves especially taboo subjects.

---

Opinion

Acceptance, not awareness

By Jeremy Moody | April 1, 2013

We autistics do not need your awareness. We walk these grounds every day. We are your fellow students, professors, friends and so on. We function quite well, and unless we identify ourselves as autistic to you, you will never know that we’re here. What we need is acceptance. Fortunately for me during my time here at the University of Virginia I have been met with open arms and acceptance from all my fellow students and professors.

---

Opinion

Groupthink

By Managing Board | April 1, 2013

Among the hundreds of bills Gov. Bob McDonnell signed into law last week, one in particular may have direct negative effects on Virginia’s public college students.

---

Opinion

When media becomes our science teacher

By Ashley Stevenson | April 1, 2013

Writing a science article is a bit like coaxing a 5-year-old into eating foie gras. Upon seeing the plate, the kid will become suspicious. He will complain about the color, poke the spongy texture and make a few skeptical faces. He must be spoon-fed the first couple of bites. If he likes it, you’re lucky. More often, you simply realize a 5-year-old won’t eat foie gras and maybe jumping straight from chicken nuggets to duck livers wasn’t the best idea.

---

Opinion

By the numbers

By Managing Board | March 28, 2013

The managing board’s occasional survey of notable numerals

---

Opinion

Take a tuition hike

By Managing Board | March 27, 2013

Because of tuition increases, financial aid will become more crucial for many students. It is disappointing that Sullivan’s financial plan does not include a more robust defense of AccessUVa. A strong financial-aid program is crucial for the University’s success. Such a program preserves the school’s public obligation to educate all worthy students, and it attracts bright thinkers from a range of communities who might not otherwise be able to afford attending college.

---

Opinion

Big brother, small device

By Meredith Berger | March 27, 2013

To add to the constant technological developments of our world, Google has recently unveiled its new Google Glass product: a device that seems to bring us even closer to the Orwellian dystopia we were all warned of in “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”

---

Opinion

A question of precedent

By Russell Bogue | March 27, 2013

This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for two cases pertaining to the illegality of same-sex marriage in the United States. On Tuesday and Wednesday, supporters and critics of gay marriage alike gathered together in person and on social media sites to voice their opinions on the issue of gay marriage. Red equal signs proliferated on Facebook as many U.Va. students expressed solidarity with the rights of same-sex couples. However, the expressions of disapproval and support concealed the fact that the very organ of government that should hold and resolve the debate over same-sex marriage is not the Supreme Court. Whether you long for the day when gay couples can marry or you shudder at the thought, the collective resolution of the American people should not come through the institution of the courts.

---

Opinion

Justice from the justices

By Forrest Brown | March 27, 2013

On a purely legal level, there is not a single compelling reason to uphold either Prop 8 or DOMA. A common argument against same-sex marriage is that it provides a different set of rules for a select population. But any analysis of this claim shows it to be not only misleading but antithetical to the truth.

---

Opinion

Grad daze

By Managing Board | March 26, 2013

GradDays seeks to accomplish several important aims. The initiative provides support for minority graduate students; it gives graduate students opportunities to socialize with peers in other departments; and, in a hostile academic climate, it offers workshops and panels that provide professional-development tips.

---

Opinion

The song of the dodo

By Alex Yahanda | March 26, 2013

There will surely be much debate about which animals deserve to be recreated. Scientists have compiled a list of around 24 animals that they hope to one day bring back. Most of those are species of birds that humans overhunted. Scientists selected some of target animals, however, because they are very recognizable. Wooly mammoths and saber-toothed tigers are among scientists’ top priorities. What, then, determines whether a particular species will be resurrected? Although I love the idea of seeing a saber-toothed tiger in the flesh, it makes sense to initially focus on bringing back species that were the most directly eliminated by human activity. Humans, for instance, hunted the dodo bird to extinction and were thus the primary reason it vanished. The same cannot be said for the saber-toothed tiger, which is believed to have died out as a result of a climate change. Species that humans needlessly destroyed should be given priority when it comes to recreation.